Ethical Issues Surrounding Gay Marriage Essay

When I infer of Ethical issues in the knowledge base today, comical Marriage get a linems to hits me the hardest. at star time Maybe it is the feature that I am bisexual myself or that I hire a lesbian uncle who has been unify for 2 years. Either commission, I am a vehement supporter of the entire wedding institution, especi eithery mirthful spousal. In this written report I go out first indentify the good issue of rattling mating and specific al maveny explore the ethical problems festal marriage presents including their pros and cons. I will then explain the spotless hypothesis of and determine how it would resolve the problems at hand.Next I will continue by contrasting the supposititious solution with perspective of towards gay marriage. Lastly, I will go over which captivate is the next to my own personal forthlook of gay marriage. lets begin with the ethical issue at hand, homo Marriage. The pay off for pederastic couples to become married is fro wned upon in unspoiled more(prenominal) or less of the world. In fact, animated Marriage is and has been unrivaled of the superlative ethical issues in the United deposits since bondage and Women Rights. In my own personal opinion, I weigh Same-sex Marriage should non be an ethical issue.What is unethical, is how A person may lie, cheat, or fornicate, and palliate experience the grace of God but if they be in a gay relationship they argon somehow well-disposedly damned. I accept by rejecting some(prenominal) one and that(a) person their constitution rights to equality is abuse. If a person is homophile and they choose to adopt their significant former(a), they realise the polished right to do so under the constitution as a U. S. citizen. By abandoning any one person the right to marry whomever they choose, that is a violation of said persons civil rights, beca utilization marriage shields legal civil status.We all be Americans who carry the right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. How can anyone cut through Americans this right primarily because of their sexual orientation? tribe pride themselves on be law abiding citizens, but choose to discriminate against homosexual persons lifestyle and love interest ground on the so called facts written more a(prenominal) years ago in a spectral book. The Bible is not the law That is one topic that most religious groups have not yet grasped. No subject field what any one persons religious beliefs argon, in that location is no law,power, or authority that gives them the right to push their religious beliefs onto an opposites life. I do not nor have I ever thought religious belief should ever be the deciding factor in the worlds verdict almost gay marriage? Today the increase buy outance of homosexuality is a direct threat to the domination of traditional Christian norms. According to the Christian Bible and galore(postnominal) other religions texts, in that location i s the believe that marriage is meant totally between a man and women, anything else is considered a act of sin.However, due to the account book stating that one should not pass judgment on another, many performes are more recently pass judgment said(prenominal)(p)-sex couples. Personally speaking, many religious church goers use the sacred scripture as a means to attack others. They mountain pass around presenting this holier than thou appearance, but neglect to honor all of the teachings their bible possesses. It is funny how those same religious groups that try to conclude that gay marriage is a sin are the same spate that are protesting to chevron their childrens public schools of religious content and practices.The time interval of Church and State has been puzzle into rank in many U. S. cities. Knowing this, I do not understand how any governance is to follow the rules on the separation of church and state, but then be given the right to place laws against gay m arriage solely based of the Bibles written word. Homosexuals do not deteriorate time personnel casualty around carve uping straighta panache sight that they are not stoped to engage in intercourse until marriage, while thats in the bible. The Bible vs. The Constitution matchms to play the biggest role in the contrast against gay marriage.People have stated, the constitution should be changed, its outdated. However, their entire program line is incorporating the first amendment right of freedom of speech. before the constitution was written, going against the government was unlawful. No one was allowed to speak their minds. I know that even in the bible when one went against what god said they were punished or put to death. Heterosexuals dont standardized certain rights in the constitution that go against their own personal beliefs, but will felon and cater to others, manage freedom of speech.Without some of those rights it would be unlawful for me to write this paper. P lus, I would have been murdered some time ago for being a neat and black, bisexual man. what most fail to realize is that yes the bible thought of gays as a sin but it also listed a number of other acts as sin. If our lives were truly run solely by the Bibles scriptures, Gay marriage would be the last of the heterosexuals problems. Especially when most of the worlds murders are committed by heterosexuals. I personally do not a identical(p) to base my arguments off a source unless I plan to use the entire source as foundation.I cannot say the constitution is wrong solely off on right I do not obligate with. But turn around and accept the others that cater to my infract living. That would label me as a hypocrite. Just the likes of how many commonwealth use their religious beliefs to fight gay rights, but fail to follow other aspects of the bibles teachings. I am just human, who am I to forecast anyone. This is just one of the many reasons why I can argue that many of the firm b elievers against gay marriage are set in hypocritical go outs. People against gay marriage title of respect that marriage is employ to expositing a family.They argue that with marriage you have children and build a happy home. However, for many people, marriage is more nigh love and joint trust than about starting a family, and so they would say that gay marriage is not an issue. So for those who say its only to start a family, I would call this a delusional fantasy. For one thither are more broken homes in the world now than anything. Now yes, Homosexual couples cannot physically reproduce on their own. However, this does not give reasonability to deny the couple the right to marry. There are heterosexual couples that cannot physically have children of their own as well.There are many women out in the world that cannot bear children due to a numerous amount of wellness issues. My own aunt Kelly was told that she can never have children of her own. Her body just doesnt have th e strength and or properly functioning variety meat to create life. The same goes for many men. I have a inhabit that recently told me that he has a condition that denies him the ability to produce productive sperm. As he likes to say, he is shooting blanks. Knowing this I didnt see any government laws stopping them from getting married. My aunt was told about her inabilities to birth, over 20 years ago.Today she has been married twice. May I remind you that she is a heterosexual woman that cannot have children of her own and is unflurried legally allowed to marry. In todays world, there are many alternative options for couples to start a family. The most popular way is playion. Also, there is much more controversy no-a-days regarding adoption . It has become apparent that more and more Homosexual couples are going outside of the United States to adopt children. They are forced to go outside of the United states due to the fact that they are not legally allowed to adopt here i n the states. homosexual and gay-parented families may be more likely than others to include members from more than one ethnic group . So because the government essentials to discriminate against the homosexual lifestyles, there are more and more American children left without a home. No one that can legally adopt them is stepping up for the responsibility. It is true that you truly respect something more that you have to fight for. My grandmother used to tell me this since I was really young. There are so many heterosexuals out there that are horrible parents or that take the gift of parenting for granted.They do medicines and make extreme terminations that break up their families or make the decision to rid themselves of the responsibility of parenting all together. I speak from person experience. As a young boy at the age of 5, my mother gave me and my 5 younger siblings up to child protective services. At the time she chose her friends and her drug abuse over her children and family. She did not charge whether we would be okay or not, she dropped me off with only 1 shoe. All my mother cared about was being able to get high without the guilt of us seeing her do it.I ended up back in the family, but my siblings were all separated some are still in the system. Now I personally have never seen a homosexual couple that are bad parents. It is usually the exact opposite. Homosexual couples have to fight in order to build their families so they try not to do anything to upsurge that chance up. I have also never met a homosexual couple that didnt postulate children. Along with starting families, those against gay marriage also argue that children brought up in a same-sex marriage theater are taught morals and beliefs. or so say that this type of household is cruel to the child, that it teaches them to go against our creator. what if their families do not share in the same religious beliefs as others. Contrary to what most assume, there are many people that do not believe in God. Just like there are many cultures that believe in gay rights. So no one can make the basis of their argument on the creator when not everyone believes in him. Also, they like to say that by growing up in a gay household, the child is going to turn gay. the association between religious attendance and attitudestoward gay marriage is liaise by a belief that sexual orientation is a woof rather than innate & . This is so ridiculous in so many ways. For one being gay is not a disease, you cant just catch it. Being gay is not something you inhabit like a accent. People are not made gay they are born gay its just a matter of when they square off to accept it. I was raise in a house with a antheral and female parenting role, and I still knew I was different. I am a bisexual male and so are many of my friends. These friends of mine were raised in all types of different households, but known were raised in same-sex households.At the same time I have 3 friends that were choose and raised by two homosexual men and not a single one of them are gay. They are all in heterosexual relationships and never once thought of being with the same-sex. These are a fewer examples of discrimination against gay marriage. Another major problem with gay marriage that people are beginning to argue is the affect of heterosexual couples. many a(prenominal) people argue that the world will change for heterosexual couples if same-sex marriages were allowed. Income taxes is one on the many reasons they have behind this outrages claim.Many people are in the belief that income taxes will be increased. Also, the IRS gives certain credits and benefits to those psyches that have children and other dependants. Heterosexuals believe that the government will be forced to mount the same financial benefits and credits on income taxes towards homosexual couples which they believe will lower everyones benefits. Along with their income taxes, theyre under the assumption that social security taxes will increased and the benefits decrease if the government has to provide alteration for these same-sex married couples.One of the more common ignorant claims is regarding heath care. People are arguing that their medical insurance premiums will rise based on these stereotypical images of homosexual lifestyles. They have always believed that homosexuals get diseases and illnesses like Aids or HIV easier than heterosexuals. Based on this belief they think that there will be a higher health care needs associated to the treatment of these more at risk diseases. These potential changes in circumstances do not hold enough credibility to deny a person the right to join the institution of marriage.It is unethical to claim the power to control if someone can get married. Most of the world believes Gay marriage is unethical. I have to disagree with that assumption. This is another way that heterosexuals choose to be hypocrites. Using Arranged marriage as an example, I prove my case. Mostly everyone in the world, whether homosexual or heterosexual, can agree that arranged marriage is unethical. Many people believe that all want arranged marriage is wrong because you should have the right to choose whom you marry. So how is that any different than what homosexuals want.Homosexuals are also being denied the chance to marry who they choose. Again being hypocritical People believe Marriage is about love and commitment. Both homosexuals and those forced into arranged marriages are victims. Neither gets to decide what they want to do, how to live, who to love. The only difference between the two is that at to the lowest degree arranged marriage is marriage. The couple that is actually in love cannot be married. When two people fall in love, they all want the same thing. They dream of this life together, married, with a family, and more. Why should homosexuals be revoked that reality.It should not matter if you are gay or straight, you should be able to get married if you want. On another note I also, do not believe that anyone should have to travel away from home to legally get married. Some people have to travel multiple states away, because none of the states near them allow same-sex marriage. The day that all 50 states come to the same decision accepting gay marriage will not come anytime soon, but I do hope I am still alive to see a good size amount of them jump the bandwagon. This is one way that would begin to solve the issue.When it comes to gay marriage, I believe the classical theory of Utilitarianism would help solve many of the problems. Utilitarianism is a consequential theory. It is the view that the virtuously right action is the action that produces the most good . The Utilitarian view seeks to maximize the overall good in a situation. In other words, one should always act in a way that produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. It is proven that there are fewer people against same-sex marriage, than for it. So the theory of Utilitarianism is the best resolution to the issue the ethical problems of gay marriage.If the government acted with utilitarian views, then we would have less anger, debate, spend less money on a unnecessary battle. Along with this view one would also need a clear perspective of the issue. A clear perspective of the issue of same-sex marriage would be relativism. Relativism is the idea that ones beliefs and values are understood in terms of ones confederation, culture, or even ones own individual values . It is the philosophical concept that all points of view are equally valid, and that all truth is relative to the individual .Both sides that are composite realize that neither side will ever agree nor neither side is right or wrong. Each Society, culture or religious group is formed by its own ethical values and beliefs, with how they see things to be right and wrong. I believe that when it comes to gay marriage everyone is going to have to agree t o disagree. Religion is the top reason to why people are against same-sex marriage. What church goers fail to realize is that they are forcing their religious beliefs onto not only the homosexuals but to all.Everyone has their own views and when Homosexuals try to voice theirs, they are attacked, (metaphorically). The only way that this problem is ever going to get anywhere is if both(prenominal) sides try to understand that just because everyone doesnt share your same views and beliefs, that doesnt make them wrong. The cannot ignorantly believe that everyone automatically shares their beliefs. Homosexuals are already at this point, they are the hypocrites in this situation. All they want is equality, the same equality that everyone else has been engagement for all these years.In conclusion, I have indentified the ethical issue of gay marriage and explored the ethical problems gay marriage presents including the pros and cons. I then explained how the classical theory of Utilitari anism would resolve those problems. I continued by contrasting the a priori solution with perspective of relativism towards gay marriage. Lastly, I went over which view is the closest to my own personal outlook of gay marriage. I do not believe that there should even be such a thing as gay marriage. The title itself is discriminatory.Gay people do not go around referring to a heterosexual couples marriage as straight marriage. So why should a society filled with diverse lifestyles be allowed to refer to homosexual marriages as gay marriage. Marriage is marriage, either way. It should not be labeled as any other. Whether, heterosexual or Homosexual, its the same institution and should hold the same rights. At the end of the day I am a firm believer that the discrimination against gay marriage should be outlawed. Gay people do value the institution of marriage, therefore their relationship and want to marry is ethical in my eyes.References Driver, J. (2009, June 21). The History of U tilitarianism. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http//plato. stanford. edu/ register/sum2009/entries/utilitarianism-history/ Haider-Markel, D. P. (2008). Beliefs about the origins of homosexuality and support for gay rights. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, pp. 291310. inside10. 1093/poq/nfn015 Mosser, K. (2010). Introduction to Ethics and Social Responsibility. San Diego Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Patterson, C. J. (2013). Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents Psychology, Law, and Policy.Psychology of informal Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(S), 2734. Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of independence Interracial Unions, Same-sex Unions, and the ever-changing American Family. Cambridge, MA Harvard University. Swoyer, C. (2010, December 21). Relativism. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http//plato. stanford. edu/entries/relativism/ Todd, N. R. , & Ong, K. S. (2012). Political and theological Orientation as Moderators for the Association Between Reli gious Attendance and Attitudes Toward Gay Marriage for White Christians. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(1), 5670.