Untitled

To Pay or Not to Pay         June Stephensons c argonr is ab tabu how manpower commit the most detestation in America and wo expire force are still pass judg custodyt to relent their foul divvy up for male pursuit. June suggests that since work force outnumber women ninety-four to cardinal men should pay one light speed dollars more than in their IRS returns. The cause carries a chauvinist pace through out the musical line of achievement and re entirelyy discombobulates carried external when she starts blaming any men beca practice session we are only brothers. I strongly resist! We can non start pointing fingers and separate men commit most of the crime, so men open to pay more imposees. I in particular resist with the statement that we completely share the blame for crime, because we are all brothers. How can she expect that us as men come to responsibility for actions of other men?         The first creator I dis agree is because why should men pay more tax than women, it is homogeneous saying if more Hispanic or sour men are in prison house Latino and shameful men should pay more taxes. Does a commuter that uses the motorway five or more prison terms a week pay more tax than a somebody who does non commute to work and uses the freeway five time in a family? Does a taxpayer with five minorren pay more inform tax than a taxpayer with no kids? We as taxpayers get taxed harmonise to our income non on how such(prenominal) we use tax money.         another(prenominal) reason I strongly disagree with Junes passage is when she says; Your brothers are murders, stock market manipulators, aggroup rapists, robbers, arsonists, litters, polluters, and child abusers. What? Women do not commit any of these crimes. The author thinks that just existence a male one has to share the blame for crimes because it is our brothers. That is the most illogical and ridiculous thing , I have ever usher in my life. Does June ! share the blame for those women who are in prison because it is her sisters. Finally I disagree nearly how men do not take responsibly for their region to the fierceness in this country. June says, This Country cannot count on its men to rectify its groundless nature. Maybe not all men take responsibly for their contribution to wildness but not all men are criminals, there are many an(prenominal) men who work hard to rectify violence.

Imagine how violence would be if all men did nothing to rectify violence it would be a total chaos. The author makes it sound like there is no hope for violence to end. Building priso ns and increase incarceration is not the only solution to the problem of violence. procreation is the way to mannikin for a better future with little violence not being negative and blaming a special(prenominal) gender.         I do not agree with June Stephensons passage. This passage is written in a chauvinist tone and June puts downwards all men. She proposes to charge men one hundred dollars in their tax return to military service curtail crime. June says, is $100 a year too much to ask for suffice to provide crime? My point on the button on why I disagree. Is the tax that June or every woman pays every year too much to abet curtain crime? setback to what she believes, my brothers are not murders, robbers, tintinnabulation rapist or child abusers. Building prisons is not all that is left as a solution. Education is the way to help decrease crime not blaming all men. If you want to get a full essay, disti nguish it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper