Philosophy Report

Comp atomic number 18, contrast, and evaluate Plato and Mill on the relation between the exclusive and nine. Two of the greatest minds in happy thought, Plato and Mill living in relatively different times, they both divided up the same issues and concerns provided with very distinct perspectives. Plato recalld that freedom was justice in the soul while Mill was defending freedom within a democracy. Is one freedom better than another freedom? Plato tries to show that item-by-item justice mirrors political justice. He believed that the soul of every individual has a three part structure interchangeable to the three classes of society.Plato, being an idealisticist, he believed that his philosophers should be impeccable with surviveledge. If performing abortions is morally completeensive- in a Platonic society that debate wouldnt happen, be begin it would be outright outlawed. So how would we know that it isnt moral? We would never know. And THAT is the kind of suppression Mill disagrees with- isnt finding out the truth more important than morality? Or is ignorance better than understanding? Mills views in the individual and society completely differ from Platos. Mills view in the individual has the experience and environment that Plato considers unimportant.Mill also believed that a human could develop intact potential only by offering the opportunity to define veritable ability in an individual. He was completely against forcing opinions from one group onto the other. It was doing harm to the individual. Mill was for the people. He understood societys struggles when it came to dangerous thrash stations to where the workers would be paid little to nothing at all. It was an evil to them to be working so hard and not being comprehended for how hard of an effort workers put into their job. Freedom surely didnt populate there and Mill strived for that to change.Virtuous and expert rules are possible if and only if the rulers whitethorn be philosophers. Plato absolutely believed normal everyday people had no itinerary in becoming a great leader because only intelligence agency and expertise is only found in Philosophers. He had the perfect pick up of an ideal ruler. He also strictly believed ones abilities salute the certain opportunities given to the philosopher while Mill believed in the complete antagonist from that. Each person is naturally suited for a certain task. If you are gifted with intelligence, Plato believes it shouldnt be put to waste.For example, you are better off being a Doctor than being a construction worker. The right-hand(a) city is possible when experts are in charge of it. Only devil worlds existed in Platos Theory of the Forms The visible world and the intelligible world. friendship comes down to having knowledge of the forms. You cannot know what is false. Opinion/belief cannot ever be wrong. Knowledge is about what is real or if you have facts to prove whether its true or false. Ignorance is sepa rate from pinion but is much clearer than ignorance. Its part truth, part ignorance.Mill thinks we should be free to do what we want, unless it doesnt cause harm to society. It would be then, that kind of freedom should be restricted but when can these freedoms be restricted? Should it come to physically harming an individual to their door of suicide? Physical harm and verbal harm play two different roles in society but I definitely believe are both dangerous. On Liberty, Mill makes funs of Plato that anyone can have an ideal society. Mill also defines justice in a variety of ship canal before making it into one whole thing.