Identity and Violence Analysis Essay -- recognition,

Identity and Violence may come out isolated from each other on a superficial level, save on a deeper analysis both seem to depend on each other. To put in a different appearance, just as long-stagnant water can give birth to deadly mosquitoes, similarly a logged and rigid definition of individuality may lead to violence which could be similar to Aedes. To briefly explain this analogy its essential to bring up to Charles Taylor who argued that identicalness is shaped in three ways-1) Recognition of identity element 2) Absence of identity3) Misrecognition of identity.All three modes of shaping identity take up the potential to bring out violence which is latent. Here, Sigmund Freuds estimate of human beings instincts being of two kinds those that conserve and unify and, the instincts to destroy and kill is rattling significant. These instincts work according to the motive, when individual works for their motive that is of shaping the identity leads to use of violent means an d ends mostly. Our presentation will include Terrell A. Northup idea of identity as a system of beliefs or a way of construing the world that makes life predictable rather than random. This way, he conceptualizes that social constructs of an identity become so entrenched that the conflict surfaces as violence. The identity basic takes the form of threat, which later gets distorted and extremely rigid and ultimately colludes in maintaining the conflict.Thus, it can be said that, identity is central almost bone marrow to individuals and their sense of connectedness to themselves and the society-scope they engage in. Kriesberg examines how there is a formation of not only ones own, save also a sense of identity of the other, which hike up reinforces the self. Though identities can be both ascribed a... ...llows that the intervention is contingent on the identity dynamics of the groups involved. For instance, peripheral would limit itself to the objective component. Similarly, ch ange in the dynamics of the relationship amidst parties,will not change the core schema, but alter the nature of the existing relationship between parties. This carries connotations of a relatively enduring change. Changes that occur in the identities of the parties are aimed at reconstructing the core schema, in this case, the perception of us and them. Such would be the case if the Israeli nominate recognizes the Palestinian State as an equal and de-emphasizes the differences between the two. This level implies a change approximating utopia. The introduction of super ordinate goals establishes a commonality between the groups, forcing them to acknowledge the other as more like self.