.

Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Coppolas Adaptation of Bram Stokers Dracula Essay -- Movie Film comp

Coppolas Adaptation of Bram Stokers genus genus genus Dracula The legendary creature Dracula has mesmerized readers and viewers for nearly a century. In Bram Stokers masterpiece, Dracula, the infamous monster affects each reader in a different way. Some find the greatest devotion to be the blue nature of his bloodsucking attacks, while others find themselves most afraid of Draculas shadow-like present nature. The fascination with Dracula has assimilated into alone parts of society. Dracula can presently be seen selling breakfast cereals, making appearances on Sesame Street, and on the silver screen. Countless video adaptations of Stokers original impertinent have been undertaken by the some of the most skilled directors in Hollywood including, Francis Ford Coppola who completed a film adaptation of Dracula in 1993. In creating his film, Coppola strived to produce a film that remained true to Stokers original creation. In fact, he insisted upon vocation the movie Bram Sto kers Dracula, but in reality the movie fell salutary short of his lofty goals. Coppola realized the complexity of Draculas character and hoped to combine all of the irresistible qualities that have made him legendary. Coppola however, became too attached to the loving corrupting nature of Dracula and neglected the monsters horror. Stokers original novel centers on the concern Dracula creates and the omnipotent nature of his existence. Dracula only directly appears in the novel a few places. The majority of his existence occurs on a sub textual level, which starkly contrasts the most recent film version. In Coppolas film, Dracula has a very active and visual role in almost every scene. It is quite understandable the temptation Coppola had of showing Dracula a... ... it is non. The movie is simply a vehicle for making money and is not truly a retelling of the original Dracula. The story is not Stokers and is merely Coppolas representation of what he feels Dracula means to peopl e in the twentieth century. The film has certain aspects of fear but falls drastically short of the fear that exists in Stokers classic story. The movie will simply be added to the enormous list of films that have attempted to recapture the magical horror of Stokers novel but have fallen drastically short. Works Cited Holte, pack Craig. Dracula in the Dark The Dracula Film Adaptations. Westport Greenwood Press, 1997. Stoker, Bram. Dracula. New York Signet, 1992. Bram Stokers Dracula. Screenplay by James V. Hart. Dir. Francis Ford Coppola. Perf. Gary Oldman, Winona Ryder, Anthony Hopkins, Keanu Reeves. Columbia Tristar, 1992.

No comments:

Post a Comment